Wednesday, November 13, 2019
How Golding Presents the Decline from Civilisation to Savagery in Lord
How Golding Presents the Decline from Civilisation to Savagery in Lord of the Flies    Lord of the Flies is the name given to the inner beast, to which only  Simon ever actually speaks. As Simon's waits for the beast's arrival  near the bloody sow's head on the stake (buzzing with flies), The Lord  of the Flies speaks to him, warning him not to get in its way or else  he shall be killed by the boys. The Lord of the Flies name comes from  the sow's head and the countless flies buzzing about it, which soon  move from the sow's head to swarm around the head of Simon as the Lord  of the Flies tells him, "I'm a part of you." In biblical texts, the  Lord of the Flies is the title of Beelzebub (a direct translation of  his name), a demon of Hell. There is a clear distinction between this  book and The Coral Island. There is no separation between boys and  savages, good and evil, Christianity and cannibalism, British and  savages in this book, where as in the Coral island this distinction  comes out many times.    Jack is the novel's primary representative of the instincts of  savagery, violence, and the desire for power, which is shown from the  beginning. When the idea of having a Chief is mentioned, Jack speaks  out immediately. "I ought to be chief," Jack says with simple  arrogance, "because I'm chapter chorister and head boy." He is furious  when he loses the election to Ralph, which subtly begins their  conflict, and continually pushes the boundaries of his subordinate  role in the group. Jack and his compatriots are portrayed as  militaristic and aggressive, with Jack's bold manner and the choir  marching in step with one another. They are the first concrete  entrance of civilization onto the island and a decidedly negative one;  ...              ... is the conflict  between two competing impulses that exist within all human beings: the  instinct to live by rules, act peacefully, follow moral commands, and  value the good of the group on the one hand; and the instinct to  gratify one's immediate desires, act violently to obtain supremacy  over others, and enforce one's will on the other. These two instincts  may be called "the instinct of civilization" and "the instinct of  savagery," as one is devoted to values that promote ordered society  and the other is devoted to values that threaten ordered society.  Throughout the novel, the instinct of civilization is associated with  goodness, while the instinct of savagery is associated with evil, and  the latter prevails. It is only at the very end of the book that the  group is drained of savagery, as the captain pictures these small,  ragged, confused little boys.                        
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.